Page 29 - EngineerIt March 2021
P. 29

OPINION



                                             that relying on conventional forms of IP and conventional IP protection strategies may well
                                             fall short of providing adequate basis for taking action against such non-IP rights holders.

                                             Redefined IP strategies
                                             When looking at the broadest form of IP protection available for technological inventions, it
                                             is noteworthy that traditionally, patents for device-related inventions would be drafted with
                                             the traditional manufacturing and assembly methods in mind.
                                               However, with 3D printing on the rise it would be necessary, and in fact essential, to
                                             consider modifying this approach to cover, expressly, the new ways of manufacturing
                                             products and/or assembling components which may have been additively manufactured.
                                               Fortunately, there are several patent-claims-drafting strategies that are taking shape in
                                             the world’s most prominent patent offices, that may be useful to IP rights holders.
                                               In addition, there are other IP rights, such as design, copyright and trademarks, that
                                             should be considered for the purposes of preventing the dissemination of digital files of a
        Thapelo Montong
                                             product online, and/or the illegal manufacturing of IP protected products using 3D printers.
                                               The South African Electronic Communications and Transactions Act could also, in
           It goes without saying that the use   some instances, be used to hold an internet service provider liable for copyright and/or
        of such enabling technologies can not   patent infringement for allowing illegally obtained digital files of a product in which IP rights
        only aid non-IP rights holders to create   subsist, to be shared and sold on their platforms.
        digital files of IP protected articles for their
        own use, but could in fact support the   Reinvention of the wheel
        establishment of an entirely new market   As much as 3D printing appears to be the new disruptive technology on the block, there
        for trading in such digital files.    is really no need to reinvent the wheel, as existing IP laws are well-equipped to address
           While one would wish immediately to   the changes and challenges that 3D printing technology brings, provided that their
        classify such a market as illegitimate with   implementation moves with the times.                      n
        reference to the counterfeit goods market,
        a more thorough view would reveal that   Contact Thapelo Montong to find out more about IP strategy and laws as they apply to
        the matter is not that straightforward and   3D printing.
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34