Page 36 - EngineerIT October 2022
P. 36

FROM A LEGAL POINT OF VIEW


           Ensuring intellectual property rights


        for computer implemented inventions





                                         By Lance Abramson, Partner, Spoor & Fisher




             he patenting of computer implemented inventions (software) is a fascinating area
             of intellectual property law that is constantly changing. Why is this and how did
        Twe get here?
           The forerunner to modern software was punch cards, with each hole in the punch
        card representing computer data and instructions. This led early legislators to include
        punch cards under copyright law and exclude these from patent law. After all, the punch
        card (software) was well protected if you couldn’t copy the layout of the holes in the
        punch cards.
           As software developed into the modern era, it quickly became apparent for software
        developers that copyright law was not adequate protection for their software as the
        software could often relatively easily be rewritten in another language, for example, and the
        copyright protection avoided.
           What ensued has been an often heated debate between two camps - to include
        software under the umbrella of patent law or not. The first view is that software should not   Lance Abramson
        be treated any differently to other forms of technology and should be fully patentable as
        long as it is new and inventive. The second view is that allowing the patenting of computer   you should not assume the software is
        software stifles innovation.                                              not patentable but rather contact a patent
           In effect what has happened is that the law around patenting of software in various   attorney who is an expert in this field.
        countries has developed differently, with two main approaches having been developed.  In South Africa, patents are not
           One approach allows software to be patented as long as the functionality implemented   examined at the time of filing and are
        by the software is new and inventive. This approach reflects the view that software should   only examined if the patent is enforced
        not be treated differently to any other form of technology. An example of this might be   or challenged. Additionally, a patent
        a new and inventive business method that is implemented in software which would be   application cannot be filed for software
        patentable in some countries.                                             that is already released into the public
           Another approach, and more widespread, is that software can only be patented if the   domain. This means software developers
        software provides a technical effect, or put another way, provides a technical solution to a   cannot wait for the first court case to be
        technical problem. Some examples of such “technical effect” software would be software   heard and then decide if they want to file
        that speeds up data transmission or software that compresses data for better storage.   for patent protection for their software.
        In these countries, the example above of a new and inventive business method that is   Rather, if they do want patent protection,
        implemented in software would not be patentable.                          they must file a patent application before
           The landscape is constantly so changeable that even last month, the High Court of   they disclose their invention. The patent
        Australia, which is that country’s highest court, issued a split decision on the patenting   application will then be granted and
        of a computer software invention. Three of the judges found a patent covering a gaming   the validity of the patent will only be
        machine, including hardware and software, was patentable, and three of the judges found   determined at some point in the future
        the patent invalid based on the question relating to the patenting of computer software!  when our courts issue their first decision
           In South Africa, we too have a unique position. Our Patents Act in Section 25(2)(e)   on this point.   n
        excludes software from patentability, but this is qualified by Section 25(3) which effectively
        states that the exclusion applies only to the extent to which the invention relates to that
        subject matter as such.                                                    About Spoor & Fisher
           At present, there is no case law in South Africa interpreting the meaning of these   Spoor & Fisher is Africa’s largest
                                                                                   specialised intellectual property law firm,
        sections and so we find ourselves in a grey area regarding what kind of software is   with African roots and global reach. The
        patentable in South Africa.                                                firm specialises in all aspects of IP law,
                                                                                   including trademarks, copyright, patents,
        So where does that leave software developers?                              registered designs, anti-counterfeiting,
        As this area of patent law is complex and continually changing, the best advice for software   commercial work with an IP flavour, and
                                                                                   litigation in these fields. www.spoor.com
        developers is that if you have developed software that you believe is new and inventive,


                                                  EngineerIT | October 2022 | 34
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41