Page 6 - EngineerIT July 2022
P. 6

FRONT COVER STORY


            Advanced operating conditions



               require processes all working



             together in a complex dance –


                                    from PID to MPC







            usiness sustainability is dependent   indeterminate delays, operators often get impatient and make further changes to the same
            on optimising return on investment   or other variables to rectify a specific situation. Unfortunately, these sudden changes often
       B(ROI) from fit for purpose, value-driven   result in out-of-control processes.
        solutions. Due to the complexity of the
        required control conditions, companies are   Why focus on process objectives – the optimum operating envelope
        starting to turn to model predictive control   Process performance variance impacts profitability; it is crucial to understand the
        (MPC) to assist in decision-making as more   circumstances that affect exceptional and poor performance - interpretation and decision
        solutions become available due to the impact   making within the production process environment. Decision-making by operational
        of artificial intelligence and machine learning.  personnel, even though assisted by sophisticated control systems (DCS, PLC or APC), plays a
           Historically, many process controllers   significant role in complex processes. Operational personnel typically need to make decisions
        tuned their processes using PID single input,   related to reagent dosing rate, feed rates, level, temperature, flow, pH set points and machine
        single output (SISO) systems; some would   speed. These decisions are applied at a functional unit or machine level. Multiple functional
        even argue the relevance of PID today.   units or machines are combined or configured to complete the value-add or conversion
        However, the multiple input, multiple output   process.
        (MIMO) capability of the MPC methodology is   The performance of the production process (which includes the physical process and
        just more advanced and reaches the desired   production and the technical teams’ quality of decisions) is measured in terms of the financial
        result faster. Furthermore, MPC should be   performance across the entire process.
        more effective than normal PID controls   Due to the nature of complex processes, performance measurements are typically
        as it uses algorithms to predict            based on aggregated production numbers. Typical management performance
        outcomes based on current   The future of     measurements include production cost per weight or volume, overall equipment
        operating conditions and   process control and   effectiveness (OEE), contribution margin per weight or volume, yield and
        effect changes to setpoints                      recovery. There is thus a disconnect between the production team and
        to improve performance,   automation depends on   management. Management measures performance in monetary terms,
        reduce fluctuations and   model predictive control   whereas the operation team deals with set points to manage process stability,
        prevent future adverse   supported by AI and     availability, process balances or energy usage at the functional unit level.
        process conditions.       machine learning.     When the production team receives feedback on its performance, it merely
           Manufacturing plant                         serves as a recording of past performance.
        processes are complex too.                      In addition to profit, there may be other, more granular objectives to achieve
        A small change in one process              the profits. These can include waste reduction, emission reduction, energy and water-
        variable may result in a small or large step   saving, extending life-of-mine or equipment life, complying with regulatory measures and
        change in another, depending on the specific   others. For each objective, there is an optimum operating envelope (OOE) of variables that
        process. These inter-relationships are not   will promote the best possible achievement of the objectives. Unfortunately, sometimes the
        easy to understand, and operators often   variables for different objectives may be in total conflict. For example, in the mining industry,
        overcompensate, resulting in fluctuating   a short-term focus on metal recovery by mining more high-grade ore and less low-grade ore
        process conditions. In addition, changing   will increase recovery (yield) but can significantly shorten the economic viability life of the
        one or more variable setpoints in a process   mine.
        may not be immediately apparent. Cycle
        time, residence time, parallel processing and   High ROI depends on achieving an optimum balance
        other factors can delay changes in process   For businesses to navigate this complexity, they must understand the optimum operating
        conditions. In addition, due to the complexity   envelope of each objective and how these need to be balanced to ensure ideal business
        of the process, the time for a process change   results by attaining all objectives to a certain degree. As a result of the conflicting objective
        to have an effect often varies because of   variables, not all objectives may be achieved completely. As in any tug-of-war, the end-point
        other process conditions and cannot be   will move one way or the other. The trick is to ensure optimum balance, where no objective is
        consistently predicted.               wholly neglected. The only way to do this is to deeply understand the factors influencing each
           When confronted with these         objective to define the optimum operating envelope, eventually leading to a higher ROI.



                                                    EngineerIT | July 2022 | 4
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11