Page 4 - Motoring Issue 1 2021
P. 4

FROM THE



                             MOTORING




       EDITOR’S DESK







            or most, the end of 2020 was greeted with relief. I, like  In this issue, we welcome two
            everybody, simply wanted to put the tumultuous year  new contributors to the family.
       Fbehind us and move on to 2021.                         Howard Dembovsky from Justice
        From the motor industry perspective, it’s a case of looking  Project SA (JPSA-org) presents
        forward. After stalling sales and new model introductions for  Howard’s Rant, his highly opinionated
        most of the year, there was a flurry of activity at the end. Launch  take on issues that affect everyone who uses our roads,
        invitations for January and February have already been received.  particularly regarding encounters with the law. Chris Wall will
           After a brief break during level 5 lockdown, test car activity  be contributing in the MotorSport arena.
        resumed at an even greater rate than before. Online launches  From all of us, we wish you a happy and, more importantly,
        did take place, but this did not satisfy the need to touch, feel  safe and healthy 2021.
        and experience. In reality, a few days or a week with a car
        provides far more insight than a digital reveal or even a short  Alan Rosenmeyer
        launch drive.                                          alanr@motormatters.net


                                             H HOOWWAARRDD’’SS  RRAANNTT
         think that it is safe to say that last year
         was tough and that the so-called ‘new
       Inormal’ is going to take quite some
        getting used to. It brings some people
        comfort that ‘we are all in this together’.
        But I am sure I need not remind you that  such offences will eventually be dealt with by the criminal justice system. Those who are
        being in something ‘together’ and sharing  convicted will get a criminal record. Conviction occurs when a person who was arrested
        the same problems are not the same thing.  pays an admission of guilt fine or is found guilty in court.
           Accompanying the declaration of a   Any person who sold cigarettes under so-called ‘levels 5 through 3’ of the lockdown
        national state of disaster due to the  was regarded as a criminal. Committing that ‘crime’ involved intent, as did walking on the
        worldwide coronavirus pandemic,      beach. It was not an ‘oopsie’, like being out of one’s home just after curfew. Then, at one
        regulations were formulated according to  second past midnight on 18 August 2020, and under level 2, selling smokes and walking
        the Disaster Management Act. The said  on the beach were perfectly legal again, although both would have to wait until 4am due
        regulations represent decrees, rather  to the curfew.
        than laws made by the legislature. They  But regardless of the offence that a person is convicted for, a criminal record is
        do follow ordinary democratic processes  imposed. It will endure for a minimum of ten years, before it can be expunged.
        but they converted many everyday things  I do not know how many people have been criminalised elsewhere in the world.
        we do into criminal offences.        Frankly, I do not care. What concerns me is the welfare of my fellow countrymen and
           If you were and continue to be    women. Sure, there is no point to laws if there are no consequences for contravening
        fortunate enough to not violate any of  them. But in my view, effectively sentencing people to a minimum of ten years of forced
        them, consider yourself lucky. By 19 June  unemployment goes way beyond draconian. It is cruel and it is not in the interests of
        2020, almost 277 000 people had been  society. It creates artificial criminals who may become real ones if they are excluded from
        arrested for contravening them. The most  employment.
        common offence was ‘failure to confine  Nothing prevented the powers that be from prescribing administrative fines instead of
        oneself to one’s place of residence’ – in  criminal offences regarding infringements of the lockdown regulations, yet the latter was
        other words ‘failure to observe effective  chosen. What kind of government chooses to add to its people’s suffering? Please do not
        house arrest’. What that tally has grown  say: “but decisions had to be taken quickly”.
        to by now is anyone’s guess.           With the return to a higher level of lockdown, new regulations still prescribe some
           Although it may take some time to  criminal offences. Should we return to an even higher level, all the other criminal offences
        unfold, everyone who stands accused of  will be back. That sucks.                                       n


                                                 MOTORING | Issue 1, 2021 | 2
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9