Page 25 - Energize February 2021
P. 25

VIEWS AND OPINION



        R16,2-billion liability shown on Eskom’s  When questioned whether the R16,2-billion liability reflected on Eskom’s balance sheet for
        2020/21 balance sheet, some R8-billion is  decommissioning, long-term storage and disposal of high-level waste, and construction and
        Eskom’s estimated liability for Koeberg’s  operation of a final repository, the spokesman for the National Nuclear Regulator (NNR),
        decommissioning, and disposal of low-  Gino Moonsamy responded:
        and intermediate-level nuclear waste at
        the existing Vaalputs repository.      “Whilst Eskom makes financial provisioning for decommissioning in its annual
           The balance of R8,2-billion is Eskom’s  financial statements, the NNR is currently reviewing all relevant provisions for
        estimated liability for long-term storage of  decommissioning. The NNR is engaging Eskom in this regard…”, and “The NNR is
        spent fuel on site, for a centralised interim  reviewing the regulatory framework including conditions of authorisation with a view
        storage facility, and for developing,  to strengthening conditions relating to decommissioning.”
        constructing, and operating a deep
        geological final repository for high-level  Eskom has confirmed that provision for future decommissioning, waste storage and
        spent fuel waste from Koeberg, plus  disposal is built into and forms an integral part of the internal transfer pricing (rand per
        associated transport costs.          kWh) of electricity generated by Koeberg into the Eskom grid. As such, these provisions
           However, based on international   are therefore ultimately recovered from customers via Eskom’s Nersa approved
        benchmarks, it seems that Eskom, as the  electricity tariffs.
        operator, has significantly underestimated  Carolissen also indicates that in due course, once the Radioactive Waste Disposal Fund
        its liabilities for decommissioning and  is set up, Eskom and Necsa will have to discharge their decommissioning, waste disposal
        disposal of high-level nuclear waste from  and final repository liabilities, by paying real money into the Fund.
        its Koeberg nuclear power station.     However, as indicated above, the problem is that Eskom and Necsa have no ringfenced
           In Germany, provisions made for   funds set aside for this purpose. Both companies are technically insolvent and not going
        nuclear decommissioning and waste    concerns, and only continue operations through regular ongoing bailouts by taxpayers via
        disposal by the big four utilities range  the sole shareholder, the state.
        from €1300 per kW of installed capacity
        at RWE, to €1700 per kW at EnBW,     Questions we should therefore be asking of government, DMRE, NNR, Nersa, NRWDI,
        €1800 per kW at E.ON, and €2000 per  Necsa, Eskom and the South African nuclear sector are:
        kW at Vattenfall.                    •  Who should be bear the cost of nuclear plant decommissioning and long-term storage
           Based on the above, one may have    and disposal of high-level nuclear waste – the polluter, the customer, or the taxpayer?
        expected that Eskom would have set   •  Where are the real asset-based funds set aside within Eskom and Necsa for future
        aside funds for high-level nuclear waste  decommissioning and long-term storage and disposal of high-level nuclear waste?
        disposal and decommissioning of the  •  Does the “polluter pays” principle apply in practice, or will the customer and taxpayer
        1800 MW Koeberg nuclear power station  end up paying twice through government bailouts at the end of the day?
        of somewhere between €2,34-billion and
        €3,6-billion i.e. between R42-billion and  One can only guess who may end up bearing the real decommissioning, high-level waste
        R64-billion (using an exchange rate of €1  storage, disposal, and final repository costs in due course – perhaps not the polluter at all,
        = R17,80), instead of only R8-billion.  but our children's children as taxpayers in the next generation.  n
           An article in energypost.eu indicates
        that EDF in France makes provision of  Send your comments to rogerl@nowmedia.co.za
        €300 per kW of installed nuclear capacity
        for decommissioning, Germany provides
                                             Koeberg nuclear power station
        €1400 per kW, and the UK provides
        €2700 per kW. Eskom’s liability for
        decommissioning and disposal of high-
        level spent fuel waste from Koeberg, on
        the other hand, amounts to only €250 per
        kW of installed nuclear capacity.

        The French National Assembly
        Commission has found that the clean-up
        of French reactors will take longer, be
        more challenging and cost much more
        than EDF anticipates, and the Commission
        is quoted as saying:
           “Other countries have embarked on
           the dismantling of their power plants,
           and the feedback we have generally
           contradicts EDF’s optimism about
           both the financial and technical
           aspects of decommissioning”.


                                                 energize | February 2021 | 23
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30