Page 17 - Dainfern Precinct issue 3 2022
P. 17

NATURE

        his Year of the Gorilla (1965). He   scientific, said, “For centuries now,   development of the young. Judging
        also used names but only in his book   male priests, doctors and scientists   by the volume of books on animal
        in which he drew attention to the   have declared . . . creatures have   behaviour since the ‘80s, it is evident
        irrefutable similarities between human   no soul, no capacity for pain, or   that female scientists approached the
        society and that of other mammals.   emotion”.                           subject with an understanding and
        Schaller and Douglas-Hamilton drew                                       empathy that was understated before.
        attention to the fact that mammals,   But “female scientists were replacing
        like humans, display emotion and    the hard, objective eye of the past   Many respected male scientists
        altruism.                           with one of a softer sight, replacing   remain sceptical about emotions
                                            a concept of anthropomorphism with   existing among animals, yet it is
        But ethology was still male-orientated   one of empathy”.                difficult to deny the significance of, for
        and, unsurprisingly, researchers were                                    instance, Dutch ethologist, Frans de
        still inclined to concentrate on the role   More and more women were now   Waal’s experience described in his
        of the male as the dominant sex.                                         2019 book, Mama’s last hug.
                                            roughing it in the wilds, the Goodall
        An anthology published in 1998 -    way. They wanted to be as close and   The ‘Mama’ referred to was a big
        Intimate Nature: the bond between   unobtrusive as possible to the animals   chimpanzee matriarch who formed
        women and animals, referred to      they were studying. It was inferred   a deep bond with Dutch biologist,
        “ground-breaking field studies by   that men, by default rather than     Jan van Hooff. Van Hooff knew her
        women scientists (which have)       intent, paid too little attention to the   for half-a-century and, knowing she
        changed the way the world sees      fundamental influences that female   must be dying, went to visit her after
        animals”.                           animals had on the social behaviour   a long absence. A cell phone video
                                            of their species. This was despite the   showed the dying chimp curled
                                            fact that most of the higher mammal
        The book’s American editors, Linda   societies they were studying were in   up, unresponsive, and refusing all
                                                                                 food as van Hoof, unannounced,
        Hogan, Deena Metzger and Brenda
 WOMEN   Peterson, came to the conclusion   Among the fundamental topics that    approaches.
                                            fact matriarchal.
        that we have become increasingly
                                                                                 De Waal wrote: “He is calling, softly
                                            male researchers tended to overlook
        separated from animals and from the
                                                                                 to her. She remains curled up,
                                            were motherhood, social bonds, and
        natural world in general. Their book,
 HAVE IT. OK?  intended to be more literary than   the vital role of female animals in the   showing no sign of recognising his
                                                                                 voice. Then an eyelid opens. Then
                                                                                 both. Suddenly Mama’s face erupts
                                                                                 into the broadest, fleshiest grin one
                                                                                 can imagine in an ape. Her feeble
                                                                                 arm uncurls from her chest and
 Photo: Francesco Ungaro, Unsplash
                                                                                 reaches out and finds her old friend’s
                                                                                 greying hair and begins to stroke it.
                                                                                 Her fingers tremble in his hair. The
                                                                                 smile remains splitting her ancient
                                                                                 face. She pulls him towards her and
                                                                                 tries to hug.”
                                                                                 Daphne Sheldrick, in her 2012
                                                                                 autobiographical Love, Life and
                                                                                 Elephants, suggested that science
                                                                                 had reached a stage where, by
                                                                                 inference, it had become neurotic
                                                                                 in precluding researchers from
                                                                                 interpreting animal behaviour in an
                                                                                 anthropomorphic way. Sheldrick
                                                                                 wrote how science tended to impose
                                                                                 its “own complicated explanations
                                                                                 as to why an animal was behaving
                                                                                 in a certain way, when, in fact, the
                                                                                 answer was pretty simple. One
                                                                                 simply had to compare it to the
                                                                                 likely response of the human animal
                                                                                 if subjected to the same set of
                                                                                 circumstances.”
                                                                                 In a lecture, American ecologist, Carl
                                                                                 Safina, put it more circumspectly,
                                                                                 “. . . people who know animals know
                                                                                 this word – anthropomorphism – and
                                                                                 know ‘You must never project human
                                                                                 feelings and emotions on other
                                                                                 animals’. But I am here to tell you I
                                                                                 think that projecting human emotions
                                                                                 and human thoughts on other animals
                                                                                 is the best first guess about what they
                                                                                 are doing and why.”
        Photo: Satya Deep, Unsplash
 14                                                        15
                                                            7
 7
                                                           DPL
                                                           DPL
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22