Page 56 - Energize August 2021
P. 56

TECHNICAL



        Results
        Figure 4(a) shows the variation of LCOE
        (US$ cents/kWh) of the system along
        with solar PV size (MWp) and the battery
        capacity (MWh). The optimum range of
        LCOE is represented inside the white
        dotted circle. The optimum LCOE for the
        complete power generation system was
        found out to be about US$12 cents/kWh.
        There are multiple system configurations,
        i.e., combinations of solar PV and battery
        capacity which can yield an optimum
        LCOE. When compared, there is no
        considerable difference between the
        LCOEs of these different configurations   Figure 4(a): Variation of LCOE with solar PV and battery size
        represented inside the circle.       Figure 4(b): Variation of RE-share with solar PV and battery size
           The optimum installed solar range was
                                              Parameter                            Optimum range     Units
        found out to be between 35 – 65 MWp
        which translated to a solar-to-load ratio of   Ratio of installed solar PV capacity per load   1,0 – 1,7   –
        between 1,0 and 1,7. On the other hand,   Battery full load hours equivalent   0,7 – 2,0     Hours
        battery sizing range was found out to be   RE-share (annual electricity generation)   30 – 40   %
        20 to 60 MWh, which translates into the
                                             Table 2: System sizing results for the base case considering current prices
        battery’s full load hour equivalent of 0,7 to
        2,0 hours. This assumes that the system can
        handle all the grid stability limitations that it
        might have when all engines are switched
        off. Again, the objective was to identify the
        overall economic potential of such system
        while maximising the RE-share.
           Figure 4(b) shows the variation of RE-
        share with solar PV and battery capacity
        with the optimal sizes represented inside
        the white circle. It can be seen from the
        figure that there is a steep increase in
        RE-share from 10% to about 40% and   Figure 5: Variation of LCOE with solar PV and battery size for (a) base case; (b) 15% cost reduction;
        then the curve tends to flatten, reaching   (c) 30% cost reduction
        a saturation point. This saturation point
        can be pushed further if the solar PV and   Conclusions
        battery capacity are increased, but only   Large off-grid solar-battery-HFO hybrid systems can reduce the cost of electricity for the
        until a certain level where any further   total power generation by more than US$3 cents/kWh, allowing a renewable energy share
        replacement of HFO in the system is only   of up to 30% to 40%. There is a range of solar PV and battery configurations which lead to
        possible through load shifting.      similar optimum LCOEs, and the optimal size needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis
           The optimal system size range reaches   reflecting the genset operational requirements.
        between 30% and 40% share of renewable   In addition, utilising cheap solar power in a fuel saver concept is not only attractive for the
        energy to the overall power generation.   mine operations to reduce cost of electricity, but also the reduction of CO 2 emissions.
        The main results of the study for the base   When looking at near to midterm future cost reduction potential for solar and battery
        case are summarised in Table 2. When   technology, the economically viable contribution of renewables in such a system exceeds
        considering the battery and solar plants   50% while further reducing costs of electricity. Combining other renewable energy sources
        near to mid-term future price reduction   like wind could further improve the business case, which should be considered when
        potential, the optimum range changes   analysing a specific project location.                           n
        significantly. A price reduction of 15% and
        30% in solar PV and battery cost shifts the   About Suntrace
        optimum range towards larger solar PV   Suntrace was established 2009 in Hamburg, Germany’s largest renewable energy cluster of
        and battery sizes reaching more than 40%   firms. http://www.suntrace.de
        and over 50% of RE-share respectively, at
        US$11,5 and US$11 cents/kWh as shown   About Reuniwatt
        in Figure 5.                         Reuniwatt is a major player in the solar radiation and cloud cover assessment and forecasting
           In summary, RE-share increases while   industry. http://www.reuniwatt.com
        the LCOE for the overall power generation
        cost including gensets decreases.    Send your comments to rogerl@nowmedia.co.za



                                                   energize | August 2021 | 54
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60