Page 25 - EngineerIT March 2022
P. 25

MEASUREMENT































        Figure 5. Rectangular enclosure with material type and first significant   Figure 7. First significant natural frequency (Hz) for similar rectangular and
        natural frequency (Hz).                                cylindrical shapes


        Should I design a rectangular or a cylindrical enclosure?  rectangle is better at withstanding deformation. However, the
        Figure 6 shows both a hollow rectangular and cylindrical stainless   cross-sectional area, A, of the cylinder is three times larger than
        steel extrusion, with 2 mm wall thickness and 40 mm height. The   the rectangle. A larger A parameter means a larger fixed constraint
        outer diameter of the cylinder is 43 mm, and the rectangular piece   both in simulation and reality – the cylinder is better designed for
        is also 43 mm on both x and y axes.                    increased rigidity or higher stiffness.
           For modal analysis, the entire 2 mm wall surface (or x, y cross-  Using the Table 3 values and equation 5, the critical frequency
        sectional area) is a fixed constraint. Figure 7 shows modal FEM   is 60.74 kHz for the cylinder and 26.56 kHz for the rectangle.
        analysis results. The first natural frequency with significant MPF
        (greater than 0.1 for the ratio of effective mass to total mass of   Table 3. Area moment of inertia (iyy), shear modulus (g), density (ρ),
        the system) is plotted vs. material shape. The cylindrical shape has   and cross-sectional area (a) for cylinder and rectangular pieces
        the highest first significant natural frequency for x and y axes, with              2         3     2
        similar performance in the z direction.                 Shape         IYY (m4)   G (N/m )   ρ (kg/m )   A (m )
                                                                Cylinder      6.24E-8   7.7E10   7850    1.03E-3
        Geometry – area and inertia                             Rectangle     9.21E-8   7.7E10   7850    0.33E-3
        Equation 4 includes both material and geometric dependencies.
        As both rectangular and cylindrical pieces were simulated using
        stainless steel parameters, the only reason for better performance
        with the cylindrical piece is geometry. Figure 8 illustrates the
        cylinder and rectangle cross section for calculation of the area
        moment of inertia and cross-sectional area of the pieces.
           The area moment of inertia, I YY, of the rectangle is almost
        50% greater than that of the cylinder, as shown in Table 3. The




















        Figure 6. Similar rectangular and cylindrical shapes for modal design study.  Figure 8. Area moment of inertia (IYY) and cross-sectional area.



                                                   EngineerIT | March 2022 | 23
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30