Page 47 - Energize November 2022
P. 47

TECHNICAL


        Ignoring accurate financial
        calculations
        Neither previous plans to build new large
        nuclear reactors, nor the PBMR plans, were
        too expensive. But the anti-nuclear activists
        were very effective in persuading the
        public otherwise. The nuclear development
        teams made careful and accurate financial
        calculations showing that the projects were
        totally affordable. In addition, the price of
        the resulting electricity would have been
        similar to that of the coal-fired electricity
        at the time. These calculations were all
        checked by foreign financial consultants.
        History has now shown them to have been
        correct.
           But there was a massive wave of anti-
        nuclear propaganda generated by activists   Figure 2: Diagram showing the fuel energy density of uranium, about a million times that of
        in which the real budgets and expenditure   petrol and coal. This is why nuclear power plants using uranium can generate huge amounts of
        patterns were highly inflated and distorted,   energy using very small volumes of fuel.
        and then provided to the media. In addition,
        the propaganda implied that all the money   The HTMR-100
        would be paid to a single foreign supplier   Simpler, cheaper and faster-to-construct
        and would be committed in one single   Sometime after the PBMR project was stopped, a group of nuclear scientists and
        payment. In fact, the budget had been   engineers got together and formed the company Steenkampskraal Thorium (Pty)
        calculated to be spent over a period of 15   Ltd, known as STL Nuclear. They started designing a simpler, cheaper and faster-to-
        years, certainly not as a once-off payment.   construct version of the PBMR called the HTMR-100. This design produces 100 MW
        In addition, multiple companies, both   of thermal energy (100 MWthermal), which generates 35 MW of electrical energy (35
        domestic and foreign, would have been   MWelectrical).
        contracted to carry out various aspects of   Two critical changes were made. One was to reduce the helium gas outlet
        the total task, rather than just ‘one supplier   temperature from 940°C to 750°C. This was done to reduce some fabrication
        takes all’. Furthermore, some of anti-nuclear   constraints and so reduce costs. The second major change was to take the helium gas
        comments in the media stated that ‘this   from the reactor via a conventional heat exchanger and drive the turbines with steam,
        payment is equal to the entire budget of the   rather than to pass the helium gas directly into the turbines. This meant that all the
        country’.                              plant ‘from the heat exchanger downwards’ could be purchased off-the-shelf and
                                               therefore did not need to be designed. This decision of course implied a simpler design
        The fleet approach verified            process and a much simpler construction of the entire power station.
        The original 9600 MW proposed for the     Currently the design of the HTMR-100 is such that construction can start on the
        large nuclear build project represented   first-of-a-kind (FOAK) plant. Current estimates are that the FOAK can be built in five
        three complete power stations of       years.
        approximately 3200 MW each, built over
        a period of 10 to 15 years, at the rate that   Process-heat: a highly profitable potential option
        the country could afford. This was called   The HTMR-100 was designed to not only produce electricity, but also to produce heat
        the ‘fleet approach’ and was designed to be   for industrial processes, without the need to first make electricity. Calculations show
        the cheapest way to build the three nuclear   this to be a highly profitable potential option.
        plants. History has shown that those plans   At the time of the PBMR, Sasol  showed great interest in an SMR to produce
        and projections were all correct. We would   process heat, since a huge amount of coal needs to be burned to produce the heat
        not have load shedding today had that   to chemically convert the rest of the coal into fuel. Enormous cost-savings could be
        project continued.                     attained if all transported coal could be converted to fuel and chemicals, without
           It is interesting to note that a four-  burning any of it for process-heat. Other applications for the HTMR-100 could include
        reactor nuclear power station, called   water desalination, among others.
        Barakah, has been built in the UAE, and
        that its final cost matches closely the South   Variable fuel options
        African calculations carried out by nuclear   The HTMR-100 was designed to run on uranium, or thorium, or a mixture of the two.
        professionals 20 years ago.            This was done in consideration of the nature of the potential world market which



                                                  energize | November 2022 | 47
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49